California 2020 Projected Urban Growth

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

You may use this work for commercial purposes.

You must attribute the creator in your own works.

2215
77
Updated
09 May 2010

20 year Projected Urban Growth scenarios. Base year is 2000. Projected year in this dataset is 2020.

By 2020, most forecasters agree, California will be home to between 43 and 46 million residents-up from 35 million today. Beyond 2020 the size of California's population is less certain. Depending on the composition of the population, and future fertility and migration rates, California's 2050 population could be as little as 50 million or as much as 70 million. One hundred years from now, if present trends continue, California could conceivably have as many as 90 million residents.

Where these future residents will live and work is unclear. For most of the 20th Century, two-thirds of Californians have lived south of the Tehachapi Mountains and west of the San Jacinto Mountains-in that part of the state commonly referred to as Southern California. Yet most of coastal Southern California is already highly urbanized, and there is relatively little vacant land available for new development. More recently, slow-growth policies in Northern California and declining developable land supplies in Southern California are squeezing ever more of the state's population growth into the San Joaquin Valley.

How future Californians will occupy the landscape is also unclear. Over the last fifty years, the state's population has grown increasingly urban. Today, nearly 95 percent of Californians live in metropolitan areas, mostly at densities less than ten persons per acre. Recent growth patterns have strongly favored locations near freeways, most of which where built in the 1950s and 1960s. With few new freeways on the planning horizon, how will California's future growth organize itself in space? By national standards, California's large urban areas are already reasonably dense, and economic theory suggests that densities should increase further as California's urban regions continue to grow. In practice, densities have been rising in some urban counties, but falling in others.

These are important issues as California plans its long-term future. Will California have enough land of the appropriate types and in the right locations to accommodate its projected population growth? Will future population growth consume ever-greater amounts of irreplaceable resource lands and habitat? Will jobs continue decentralizing, pushing out the boundaries of metropolitan areas? Will development densities be sufficient to support mass transit, or will future Californians be stuck in perpetual gridlock? Will urban and resort and recreational growth in the Sierra Nevada and Trinity Mountain regions lead to the over-fragmentation of precious natural habitat? How much water will be needed by California's future industries, farms, and residents, and where will that water be stored? Where should future highway, transit, and high-speed rail facilities and rights-of-way be located? Most of all, how much will all this growth cost, both economically, and in terms of changes in California's quality of life?

Clearly, the more precise our current understanding of how and where California is likely to grow, the sooner and more inexpensively appropriate lands can be acquired for purposes of conservation, recreation, and future facility siting. Similarly, the more clearly future urbanization patterns can be anticipated, the greater our collective ability to undertake sound city, metropolitan, rural, and bioregional planning.

Consider two scenarios for the year 2100. In the first, California's population would grow to 80 million persons and would occupy the landscape at an average density of eight persons per acre, the current statewide urban average. Under this scenario, and assuming that 10% percent of California's future population growth would occur through infill-that is, on existing urban land-California's expanding urban population would consume an additional 5.06 million acres of currently undeveloped land. As an alternative, assume the share of infill development were increased to 30%, and that new population were accommodated at a density of about 12 persons per acre-which is the current average density of the City of Los Angeles. Under this second scenario, California's urban population would consume an additional 2.6 million acres of currently undeveloped land. While both scenarios accommodate the same amount of population growth and generate large increments of additional urban development-indeed, some might say even the second scenario allows far too much growth and development-the second scenario is far kinder to California's unique natural landscape.

This report presents the results of a series of baseline population and urban growth projections for California's 38 urban counties through the year 2100. Presented in map and table form, these projections are based on extrapolations of current population trends and recent urban development trends. The next section, titled Approach, outlines the methodology and data used to develop the various projections. The following section, Baseline Scenario, reviews the projections themselves. A final section, entitled Baseline Impacts, quantitatively assesses the impacts of the baseline projections on wetland, hillside, farmland and habitat loss.

Layer ID 670
Data type Vector polygon
Feature count 9097
Services Vector Query API

US Counties and County Equivalents from the 2008 Census. Downloaded from the US Census Bureau.

Layer ID 483
Data type Vector multipolygon
Feature count 3233
Services Vector Query API

California 3-Digit ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (Census 2000)

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

You may use this work for commercial purposes.

You must attribute the creator in your own works.

438
9
Updated
17 Oct 2011

Census 2000 3-Digit ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs).

Source: www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/z32000.html
Metadata:

Layer ID 646
Data type Vector polygon
Feature count 113
Services Vector Query API

US Counties and County Equivalents from the 2000 Census. Downloaded from the US Census Bureau.

Layer ID 484
Data type Vector multipolygon
Feature count 3232
Services Vector Query API

American Indian/Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian Areas from the 2008 Census. Downloaded from the US Census Bureau.

Layer ID 495
Data type Vector multipolygon
Feature count 756
Services Vector Query API

Consolidated Cities (Census 2000)

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

You may use this work for commercial purposes.

You must attribute the creator in your own works.

133
4
Updated
17 Oct 2011

Census 2000 Consolidated Cities Cartographic Boundary Files.

Source: www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/cc2000.html
Metadata: www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/pl_metadata.html

Layer ID 634
Data type Vector polygon
Feature count 10
Services Vector Query API

Cailfornia 5-Digit ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (Census 2000)

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

You may use this work for commercial purposes.

You must attribute the creator in your own works.

114
16
Updated
17 Oct 2011

Census 2000 5-Digit ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs).

Source: www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/z52000.html
Metadata: www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/zt_metadata.html

Layer ID 638
Data type Vector polygon
Feature count 2490
Services Vector Query API

California County Subdivisions (Census 2000)

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

You may use this work for commercial purposes.

You must attribute the creator in your own works.

91
11
Updated
17 Oct 2011

Census 2000 County Subdivisions.

Source: www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/cs2000.html
Metadata: www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/cs_metadata.html

Layer ID 643
Data type Vector polygon
Feature count 400
Services Vector Query API

California 110th Congressional Districts (Jan. 2007 - Jan. 2009)

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

You may use this work for commercial purposes.

You must attribute the creator in your own works.

87
11
Added
29 Mar 2009

110th Congressional Districts (Jan. 2007 - Jan. 2009).

Source: www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/cd110.html
Metadata: www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/cd_metadata.html

Layer ID 647
Data type Vector multipolygon
Feature count 53
Services Vector Query API

California County and County Equivalent Areas (Census 2000)

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

You may use this work for commercial purposes.

You must attribute the creator in your own works.

68
26
Updated
17 Oct 2011

Census 2000 County and County Equivalent Areas.

Source: www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/co2000.html
Metadata: www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/co_metadata.html

Layer ID 645
Data type Vector polygon
Feature count 68
Services Vector Query API
Results 1 to 10 of 33